{"id":8552,"date":"2015-06-25T07:30:06","date_gmt":"2015-06-25T11:30:06","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/wp.edilex.com\/recente-decision-de-la-cour-superieure-en-matiere-dirrecevabilite\/"},"modified":"2024-03-26T10:58:00","modified_gmt":"2024-03-26T14:58:00","slug":"recente-decision-de-la-cour-superieure-en-matiere-dirrecevabilite","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/edilex.com\/fr\/blog\/2015\/06\/25\/recente-decision-de-la-cour-superieure-en-matiere-dirrecevabilite\/","title":{"rendered":"R\u00e9cente d\u00e9cision de la Cour sup\u00e9rieure en mati\u00e8re d’irrecevabilit\u00e9!"},"content":{"rendered":"

La Cour sup\u00e9rieure a r\u00e9cemment eu \u00e0 statuer sur l’irrecevabilit\u00e9 d’une d\u00e9fense en vertu des articles 54.1 et 165(4) C.p.c. Plus pr\u00e9cis\u00e9ment, la Cour devait \u00e0 la fois se demander si la d\u00e9fense de Groupe de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 Garda, s.e.n.c. (\u00abGarda<\/strong>\u00bb) \u00e9tait\u00a0irrecevable puisque non fond\u00e9e en droit et d\u00e9terminer si elle \u00e9tait abusive.<\/p>\n

Dans cette affaire<\/span><\/a>, la demanderesse, 183426 Canada inc. (\u00ab183426<\/strong>\u00bb), agit \u00e0 titre de fournisseur de services de remplacement pour les caisses de la F\u00e9d\u00e9ration des Caisses Desjardins du Qu\u00e9bec (la \u00abF\u00e9d\u00e9ration<\/strong>\u00bb). Les contrats de fourniture de services sont octroy\u00e9s \u00e0 la suite d’appels de propositions par la F\u00e9d\u00e9ration. Voyant sa proposition rejet\u00e9e au terme\u00a0de ce processus, 183426 vend la totalit\u00e9 de ses actifs \u00e0 Garda. Simultan\u00e9ment, une convention d’entiercement est conclue avec un cabinet d’avocats \u00e0 titre de d\u00e9positaire du solde du prix de vente, soit une somme de 200 000$.<\/p>\n

Or, dans une autre instance, un recours en dommages-int\u00e9r\u00eats est intent\u00e9 contre Garda au motif que cette derni\u00e8re\u00a0a agi de mauvaise foi lors du processus d’appel de propositions afin d’acheter \u00e0 rabais les actifs de 183426. De son c\u00f4t\u00e9, 183426 d\u00e9pose une requ\u00eate en jugement d\u00e9claratoire afin de faire d\u00e9clarer que le solde du prix de vente lui est d\u00fb et d’ordonner au d\u00e9positaire de lui verser ladite somme.<\/p>\n

Quant \u00e0 Garda, elle soutient que le d\u00e9positaire a raison de retenir la somme qu’il d\u00e9tient, notamment puisque 183426\u00a0a agi de mauvaise foi en lui cachant\u00a0son intention de la poursuivre en dommages. Dans sa d\u00e9fense, Garda demande le rejet de la requ\u00eate en jugement d\u00e9claratoire. Pour ces raisons, 183426 d\u00e9pose une requ\u00eate en irrecevabilit\u00e9 \u00e0 l’\u00e9gard de la d\u00e9fense de Garda au motif que celle-ci est mal fond\u00e9e en droit et abusive.<\/p>\n

Au terme de son analyse, la Cour conclut non seulement que la d\u00e9fense de Garda est mal fond\u00e9e en droit, mais la qualifie\u00a0\u00e9galement d’abusive.\u00a0Les deux moyens de d\u00e9fense invoqu\u00e9s par Garda sont les suivants:<\/p>\n

1) la violation par 183426 de son obligation d’agir de bonne foi en omettant d’informer Garda de son intention d’intenter un recours contre elle; et<\/p>\n

2) l’introduction d’un recours en dommages par 183426 constitue un manquement \u00e0\u00a0ses obligations contractuelles d\u00e9coulant de la Convention d’achat d’actifs.<\/p>\n

La Cour \u00e9nonce que ces deux moyens de d\u00e9fense ne donnent pas ouverture aux conclusions recherch\u00e9es, soit le rejet du recours de 183426.<\/p>\n

En ce qui concerne le premier moyen de d\u00e9fense, la Cour est d’avis que les conditions relatives \u00e0 l’application de l’exception d’inex\u00e9cution ne sont pas r\u00e9unies. En effet, cette d\u00e9fense\u00a0s’applique uniquement aux obligations \u00abinterd\u00e9pendantes et corr\u00e9latives\u00bb. Or en l’esp\u00e8ce, les obligations ne sont pas corr\u00e9latives \u00abpuisque l’inex\u00e9cution invoqu\u00e9e par Garda, soit la violation par 183426 de son obligation implicite d’agir de bonne foi dans le cadre des ses relations contractuelles avec elle, ne constitue pas l’inex\u00e9cution d’une obligation r\u00e9ciproque et corr\u00e9lative de 183426 \u00e0 l’\u00e9gard de la Somme entierc\u00e9e\u00bb. De plus, comme ce moyen de d\u00e9fense n’est qu’une solution temporaire, il \u00abne donne pas ouverture \u00e0 la conclusion recherch\u00e9e par Garda, soit le rejet de la r\u00e9clamation de 183426\u00bb.<\/p>\n

Quant au deuxi\u00e8me moyen de d\u00e9fense, la Cour \u00e9nonce que \u00ables fautes reproch\u00e9es par Garda ne lui conf\u00e8rent aucun droit de r\u00e9tention de la Somme entierc\u00e9e\u00bb. Pour ces raisons, elle conclut que la d\u00e9fense de Garda est irrecevable puisque mal fond\u00e9e en droit.<\/p>\n

Dans un deuxi\u00e8me temps, la Cour s’interroge sur le caract\u00e8re abusif de la d\u00e9fense de Garda. Elle pr\u00e9cise d’abord que \u00abce n’est pas parce qu’une proc\u00e9dure se r\u00e9v\u00e8le sans fondement juridique qu’elle doit n\u00e9cessairement \u00eatre qualifi\u00e9e d’abusive\u00bb. Bien que Garda n’ait pas adopt\u00e9 un comportement abusif, ses moyens de d\u00e9fense s’av\u00e8rent \u00abpurement dilatoires puisqu’ils ne donnent pas ouverture aux conclusions recherch\u00e9es\u00bb. Pour ces raisons, la Cour \u00e9nonce que la d\u00e9fense est \u00e0 la foi\u00a0mal fond\u00e9e en droit et abusive, accueillant ainsi la requ\u00eate en irrecevabilit\u00e9 de 183426.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

La Cour sup\u00e9rieure a r\u00e9cemment eu \u00e0 statuer sur l’irrecevabilit\u00e9 d’une d\u00e9fense en vertu des articles 54.1 et 165(4) C.p.c. Plus pr\u00e9cis\u00e9ment, […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":15,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"inline_featured_image":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-8552","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-actualites-juridiques"],"yoast_head":"\nR\u00e9cente d\u00e9cision de la Cour sup\u00e9rieure en mati\u00e8re d'irrecevabilit\u00e9! - Edilex.com<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/edilex.com\/fr\/blog\/2015\/06\/25\/recente-decision-de-la-cour-superieure-en-matiere-dirrecevabilite\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"fr_FR\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"R\u00e9cente d\u00e9cision de la Cour sup\u00e9rieure en mati\u00e8re d'irrecevabilit\u00e9!\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"La Cour sup\u00e9rieure a r\u00e9cemment eu \u00e0 statuer sur l’irrecevabilit\u00e9 d’une d\u00e9fense en vertu des articles 54.1 et 165(4) C.p.c. Plus pr\u00e9cis\u00e9ment, […]\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/edilex.com\/fr\/blog\/2015\/06\/25\/recente-decision-de-la-cour-superieure-en-matiere-dirrecevabilite\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Edilex.com\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2015-06-25T11:30:06+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2024-03-26T14:58:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Edilex\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"\u00c9crit par\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Edilex\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Dur\u00e9e de lecture estim\u00e9e\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"4 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/edilex.com\\\/fr\\\/blog\\\/2015\\\/06\\\/25\\\/recente-decision-de-la-cour-superieure-en-matiere-dirrecevabilite\\\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/edilex.com\\\/fr\\\/blog\\\/2015\\\/06\\\/25\\\/recente-decision-de-la-cour-superieure-en-matiere-dirrecevabilite\\\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Edilex\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/edilex.com\\\/fr\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/52d2044714c536753fb0add3ceb175db\"},\"headline\":\"R\u00e9cente d\u00e9cision de la Cour sup\u00e9rieure en mati\u00e8re d’irrecevabilit\u00e9!\",\"datePublished\":\"2015-06-25T11:30:06+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2024-03-26T14:58:00+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/edilex.com\\\/fr\\\/blog\\\/2015\\\/06\\\/25\\\/recente-decision-de-la-cour-superieure-en-matiere-dirrecevabilite\\\/\"},\"wordCount\":755,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/edilex.com\\\/fr\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"Actualit\u00e9s juridiques\"],\"inLanguage\":\"fr-FR\"},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/edilex.com\\\/fr\\\/blog\\\/2015\\\/06\\\/25\\\/recente-decision-de-la-cour-superieure-en-matiere-dirrecevabilite\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/edilex.com\\\/fr\\\/blog\\\/2015\\\/06\\\/25\\\/recente-decision-de-la-cour-superieure-en-matiere-dirrecevabilite\\\/\",\"name\":\"R\u00e9cente d\u00e9cision de la Cour sup\u00e9rieure en mati\u00e8re d'irrecevabilit\u00e9! - Edilex.com\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/edilex.com\\\/fr\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2015-06-25T11:30:06+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2024-03-26T14:58:00+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/edilex.com\\\/fr\\\/blog\\\/2015\\\/06\\\/25\\\/recente-decision-de-la-cour-superieure-en-matiere-dirrecevabilite\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"fr-FR\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/edilex.com\\\/fr\\\/blog\\\/2015\\\/06\\\/25\\\/recente-decision-de-la-cour-superieure-en-matiere-dirrecevabilite\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/edilex.com\\\/fr\\\/blog\\\/2015\\\/06\\\/25\\\/recente-decision-de-la-cour-superieure-en-matiere-dirrecevabilite\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Accueil\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/edilex.com\\\/fr\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"R\u00e9cente d\u00e9cision de la Cour sup\u00e9rieure en mati\u00e8re d’irrecevabilit\u00e9!\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/edilex.com\\\/fr\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/edilex.com\\\/fr\\\/\",\"name\":\"Edilex.com\",\"description\":\"Offrir la meilleure exp\u00e9rience juridique par l'innovation.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/edilex.com\\\/fr\\\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/edilex.com\\\/fr\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"fr-FR\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/edilex.com\\\/fr\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Edilex.com\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/edilex.com\\\/fr\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"fr-FR\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/edilex.com\\\/fr\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/edilex.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2024\\\/01\\\/Logo-Edilex-2024-Officiel.png\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/edilex.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2024\\\/01\\\/Logo-Edilex-2024-Officiel.png\",\"width\":2313,\"height\":621,\"caption\":\"Edilex.com\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/edilex.com\\\/fr\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"}},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/edilex.com\\\/fr\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/52d2044714c536753fb0add3ceb175db\",\"name\":\"Edilex\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"fr-FR\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Edilex\"},\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/edilex.com\\\/fr\\\/blog\\\/author\\\/edilex\\\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"R\u00e9cente d\u00e9cision de la Cour sup\u00e9rieure en mati\u00e8re d'irrecevabilit\u00e9! - Edilex.com","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/edilex.com\/fr\/blog\/2015\/06\/25\/recente-decision-de-la-cour-superieure-en-matiere-dirrecevabilite\/","og_locale":"fr_FR","og_type":"article","og_title":"R\u00e9cente d\u00e9cision de la Cour sup\u00e9rieure en mati\u00e8re d'irrecevabilit\u00e9!","og_description":"La Cour sup\u00e9rieure a r\u00e9cemment eu \u00e0 statuer sur l’irrecevabilit\u00e9 d’une d\u00e9fense en vertu des articles 54.1 et 165(4) C.p.c. Plus pr\u00e9cis\u00e9ment, […]","og_url":"https:\/\/edilex.com\/fr\/blog\/2015\/06\/25\/recente-decision-de-la-cour-superieure-en-matiere-dirrecevabilite\/","og_site_name":"Edilex.com","article_published_time":"2015-06-25T11:30:06+00:00","article_modified_time":"2024-03-26T14:58:00+00:00","author":"Edilex","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"\u00c9crit par":"Edilex","Dur\u00e9e de lecture estim\u00e9e":"4 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/edilex.com\/fr\/blog\/2015\/06\/25\/recente-decision-de-la-cour-superieure-en-matiere-dirrecevabilite\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/edilex.com\/fr\/blog\/2015\/06\/25\/recente-decision-de-la-cour-superieure-en-matiere-dirrecevabilite\/"},"author":{"name":"Edilex","@id":"https:\/\/edilex.com\/fr\/#\/schema\/person\/52d2044714c536753fb0add3ceb175db"},"headline":"R\u00e9cente d\u00e9cision de la Cour sup\u00e9rieure en mati\u00e8re d’irrecevabilit\u00e9!","datePublished":"2015-06-25T11:30:06+00:00","dateModified":"2024-03-26T14:58:00+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/edilex.com\/fr\/blog\/2015\/06\/25\/recente-decision-de-la-cour-superieure-en-matiere-dirrecevabilite\/"},"wordCount":755,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/edilex.com\/fr\/#organization"},"articleSection":["Actualit\u00e9s juridiques"],"inLanguage":"fr-FR"},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/edilex.com\/fr\/blog\/2015\/06\/25\/recente-decision-de-la-cour-superieure-en-matiere-dirrecevabilite\/","url":"https:\/\/edilex.com\/fr\/blog\/2015\/06\/25\/recente-decision-de-la-cour-superieure-en-matiere-dirrecevabilite\/","name":"R\u00e9cente d\u00e9cision de la Cour sup\u00e9rieure en mati\u00e8re d'irrecevabilit\u00e9! - Edilex.com","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/edilex.com\/fr\/#website"},"datePublished":"2015-06-25T11:30:06+00:00","dateModified":"2024-03-26T14:58:00+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/edilex.com\/fr\/blog\/2015\/06\/25\/recente-decision-de-la-cour-superieure-en-matiere-dirrecevabilite\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"fr-FR","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/edilex.com\/fr\/blog\/2015\/06\/25\/recente-decision-de-la-cour-superieure-en-matiere-dirrecevabilite\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/edilex.com\/fr\/blog\/2015\/06\/25\/recente-decision-de-la-cour-superieure-en-matiere-dirrecevabilite\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Accueil","item":"https:\/\/edilex.com\/fr\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"R\u00e9cente d\u00e9cision de la Cour sup\u00e9rieure en mati\u00e8re d’irrecevabilit\u00e9!"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/edilex.com\/fr\/#website","url":"https:\/\/edilex.com\/fr\/","name":"Edilex.com","description":"Offrir la meilleure exp\u00e9rience juridique par l'innovation.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/edilex.com\/fr\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/edilex.com\/fr\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"fr-FR"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/edilex.com\/fr\/#organization","name":"Edilex.com","url":"https:\/\/edilex.com\/fr\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"fr-FR","@id":"https:\/\/edilex.com\/fr\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/edilex.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/01\/Logo-Edilex-2024-Officiel.png","contentUrl":"https:\/\/edilex.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/01\/Logo-Edilex-2024-Officiel.png","width":2313,"height":621,"caption":"Edilex.com"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/edilex.com\/fr\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"}},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/edilex.com\/fr\/#\/schema\/person\/52d2044714c536753fb0add3ceb175db","name":"Edilex","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"fr-FR","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Edilex"},"url":"https:\/\/edilex.com\/fr\/blog\/author\/edilex\/"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/edilex.com\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/8552","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/edilex.com\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/edilex.com\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/edilex.com\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/15"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/edilex.com\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=8552"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/edilex.com\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/8552\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/edilex.com\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=8552"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/edilex.com\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=8552"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/edilex.com\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=8552"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}